De Los Reyes v. State Farm Lloyds

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED October 18, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ncthan □□□□□□ Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION ESTUARDO DE LOS REYES, § “Plaintiff,” § § v. § Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-000071 § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § “Defendant.” § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION A MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are these pleadings: Plaintiffs “Opposed Motion for Remand” (“MFR”) (Dkt. No. 5), Defendant’s “Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand” (Dkt. No. 9), and the “Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 14). The R&R recommends this Court deny Plaintiff's MFR. See Dkt. No. 14 at 7.

No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989), Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.

Plaintiff's MFR (Dkt. No. 5) is DENIED.

LW □ Signed on this | & day of ( de toh, os , 2022.

Rolando Olvera United States District Judge