Garcia v. Gonzalez <b><font color=\red\">Preclusion Order DE 28 filed. MUST FILE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS.</font></b>"
Garcia v. Gonzalez <b><font color=\red\">Preclusion Order DE 28 filed. MUST FILE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS.</font></b>"
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 14, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ADAM LEAL GARCIA, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00151 § PATRICA LEAL GONZALEZ, et al., § § Defendants. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE On September 13, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (M&R, D.E. 7). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 7), and all other relevant documents in the record, and 1 / 2 finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED on October 14, 2022. [phy GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown