Gordon v. Lumpkin <b><font color=\red\">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</b></font>"
Gordon v. Lumpkin <b><font color=\red\">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</b></font>"
Trial Court Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 17, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION JEFFERY WADE GORDON, § “Petitioner”, § Vv. ; Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-131 BOBBY LUMPKIN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, § Correctional Institutions Division, § “Respondent”. § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are these pleadings: Petitioner’s untitled submission (“Petitioner’s Untitled Submission”) (Dkt. No. 1) and Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 6). A review of Petitioner’s Untitled Submission reveals that: (1) he is seeking to assert § 2254 habeas claims; and (2) he may also be trying to assert § 1983 civil rights claims. The R&R recommends this Court (1) sever Petitioner’s Untitled Submission (Dkt. No. 1) into a§ 1983 “Complaint” and a § 2254 “Petition” (2) dismiss Petitioner’s § 1983 Complaint without prejudice to refiling (3) direct the Clerk of Court to send Petitioner a form for refiling of a
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint and an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (4) notify Petitioner that, if he wishes to file a § 1983 Complaint, he should complete the form and file it within the District and Division where the conduct causing his alleged injuries occurred and (5) direct the Clerk of Court to transfer Petitioner’s Petition to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to Jaw” standard of review. United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED. 1. Petitioner’s Untitled Submission (Dkt. No. 1) is SEVERED into a§ 1983 “Complaint” and a § 2254 “Petition”, 2. Petitioner’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to send Petitioner a form for the filing of a 42 U.S.C § 1983 complaint and an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis.
4. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to NOTIFY Petitioner that, if he wishes to file a § 1983 Complaint, he should complete the form and file it with the District and Division where the conduct causing his alleged injuries occurred. 5. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to TRANSFER Petitioner’s Petition to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
Signed on this |"? by day of () oven hes, 2022.
Rolaydo Olvera United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown