□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED 2, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT severe □ □□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS eee BROWNSVILLE DIVISION CELA MORA, § “Plaintiff”, § § Vv. § Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00199 § ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. ET AL., § “Defendants”. § § § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are these pleadings: Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” (“MTD”) (Dkt. No. 17), Plaintiffs “Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” (“Response”) (Dkt. No. 19), Defendants’ “Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss” (“Reply”) (Dkt. No. 22) and Magistrate J udge’s “Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 34). The R&R recommends this Court (1) grant Defendants’ MTD (Dkt. No. 17); (2) dismiss all Plaintiff's claims; (3) deny Plaintiff's request for leave to amend her Complaint; and (4) direct the Clerk of the Court to close this case. No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989), Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED. Defendants’ MTD (Dkt. No.17) is GRANTED. All Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's request for leave to amend her Complaint is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case.

Signed on this } sb day of oven leas’ , 2022.

Rolanio Olvera United States District Jugée