Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT severe □□ □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JULIAN GALVAN SILVAS, JR., § Plaintiff, : V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00070 DOCTOR VILLEREAL, et al., : Defendants. ; ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 55). The M&R recommends that Plaintiff S motions iG reopen the case, construed as motions for reconsideration, (D.E. 53; D.E. 54), be denied. (D.E. 55). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the __M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 55). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motions to reopen the case. (D.E. 53; D.E. 54). SO ORDERED. \ | DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Yexas November / , 2022