Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 03, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk . CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION AGUSTIN NUNEZ-REYNOSO, § □ Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00069 WARDEN COX, ef al., Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION □ Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 16). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, (D.E. 14), and deny Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under

, (D.E. 1). (D.E. 16, p. 9). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 16). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (D.E. 14). As such, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's § 2241 petition. (D.E. 1). A final judgment will be entered separately.

1/2

SO ORDERED. | | ( DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas November 3, 2022

2/2