District Court, E.D. Texas, 2022

Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
District Court, E.D. Texas · Decided January 6, 2022
Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00351 Jose Gonzalez, Plaintiff, V. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff filed this civil-rights action on August 24, 2021. Doc. 1.

Thereafter, on December 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss defendant Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) with- out prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Doc.

34. This cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report and recommendation rec- ommending that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant TDJC with- out prejudice be granted. Doc. 38. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge’s report.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss (Doc.

34) is granted, and the asserted claim against TDCJ is dismissed without prejudice. As this was the only pending claim asserted against defendant TDCJ, the clerk of court is directed to terminate TDC] from the docket by way of this dismissal. Further, plaintiff’s unopposed motion to file a second amended complaint (Doc. 31) is granted. The attachment to that motion (Doc. 31-1) shall be docketed as the live complaint in this matter.

So ordered by the court on January 6, 2022.

jf CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.