Minter v. Smith
Minter v. Smith
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00387 Quintraveon Minter, Plaintiff, V. Larry Smith, Defendant.
ORDER Plaintiff Quintraveon Minter, proceeding pro se, jointly filed a civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983with several other inmates. The plaintiff’s case was severed from those of the other in- mates and referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Docs. 1, 14, 15. On December 16, 2021, the magistrate judge issued a report rec- ommending that the plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s orders and to prosecute his case. Doc. 18. No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by the court on February 3, 2022. fake BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown