Adams v. Beusch
Adams v. Beusch
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00334 Alex Adams, Plaintiff, v. Sgt. Beusch et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Alex Adams, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutions Division proceeding pro se, filed this civil action complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $212.00. By separate order, the magistrate judge directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint setting out a short and plain statement of his claims. When plain- tiff did not comply with these orders, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending dismissal of the lawsuit for failure to pros- ecute or to obey an order of the court. Plaintiff filed objections saying he did not want the court to ask him to amend his complaint and that he has submitted a re- quest for payment of the filing fee, pointing to an I-60 request form he sent to the inmate trust department. The response to this form advised plaintiff that court fees could only be withdrawn with a court order or an initial partial fee payment authorization. Otherwise, the department would process the I-25 [i.e. an inmate request for withdrawal form] as soon as possible when it is re- ceived. Plaintiff does not provide a valid basis for failing to amend his complaint as ordered, nor has he shown he followed proper procedures in requesting the withdrawal from his account.
The court reviews the objected-to portions of a report and rec- ommendation de novo.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1430(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and the objec- tions de novo, the court overrules the plaintiff’s objections and accepts the report’s findings and recommendations. The court orders that the above styled civil action is dismissed without prej- udice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the court. So ordered by the court on January 13, 2022. Conboes —_fabok. BARKER United States District Judge
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown