Slape v. Warden Geter/FCI Texarkana

District Court, E.D. Texas

Slape v. Warden Geter/FCI Texarkana

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

CORY SLAPE, § §

§ CASE NO. 5:19-CV-00099-RWS-CMC Plaintiff, §

§ v. §

§ WARDEN GETER, § § Defendant. § § §

ORDER

Cory Slape, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Caroline M. Craven, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

and applicable orders of the Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report recommending that a motion to dismiss filed by the Respondent be granted and the petition be dismissed without prejudice as moot. Docket No. 16. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.1 Accordingly, Petitioner is not entitled to de novo review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C); Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

1 The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Petitioner’s last known address on January 25, 2022. Petitioner is a pro se litigant and, under the Local Rules of the Eastern District of Texas, pro se litigants must provide the Court with a physical address and are responsible for keeping the clerk advised in writing of the current address. Local Rule CV-11(d). To date, Petitioner has not acknowledged receipt for the Report and Recommendation. Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and agrees with the Report of the Magistrate Judge. See United States v. Raddatz,

447 U.S. 667, 683

(1980) (“[T]he statute permits the district court to give to the magistrate’s proposed findings of fact and recommendations ‘such weight as [their] merit commands and the sound discretion of the judge warrants .. . .””) (quoting Mathews v. Weber,

423 U.S. 262, 275

(1976)). The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16) as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED and this petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 2nd day of March, 2022.

[Dohert LU Llpectsr G2. ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown