Pedraza v. Federal Housing Authority

District Court, E.D. Texas

Pedraza v. Federal Housing Authority

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00468 Jaime Pedraza, Plaintiff, V. Federal Housing Authority et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Jaime Pedraza, an inmate proceeding pro se and 7” forma pauperis, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate John D. Love pur- suant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b). On February 16, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report rec- ommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order to pay an initial, partial filing fee. Doc. 14. No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by the court on March 31, 2022. flecbode BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown