Jaramillo v. Texas, TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00253 Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Texas, TDCJ-CID et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil- rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a re- port and recommendation (Doc. 35) concluding that plaintiff’s mo- tion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 27) should be denied for failing to meet the necessary prerequisites for a preliminary injunction pur- suant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts the report and recommen- dation. Doc. 35. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc.

27) is denied.

So ordered by the court on April 25, 2022. [lacked BARKER United States District Judge