Bennett v. Cerliano
Bennett v. Cerliano
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00453 Jacob Bennett, Plaintiff, V. Maxey Cerliano et al., Defendants.
ORDER On November 18, 2021, plaintiff Jacob Bennett, proceeding pro se and im forma pauperis, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. The case was referred to United States Mag- istrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 3. On January 18, 2022, the magistrate judge instructed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days of receipt of the order. Doc. 6. Plaintiff failed to do so. On March 11, 2022, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending that plaintiff’s case be dis- missed without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to obey a court order. Doc. 9. No objections have been filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that the report contains no clear error, the court accepts the findings and conclusions of the report. Doc. 9. Accordingly, the complaint is dis- missed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order.
So ordered by the court on April 28, 2022. feck BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown