Jackson v. Coffield Unit

District Court, E.D. Texas

Jackson v. Coffield Unit

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00498 David Jackson, Plaintiff, V. Coffield Unit et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff David Jackson, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. The case was trans- ferred to this court for proper venue and referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b). Doc. 4. On March 31, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s orders to satisfy the filing fee requirement and to file an amended complaint. Doc. 14. No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by the court on May 24, 2022. flecks BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown