Harness v. Longview Police Department

District Court, E.D. Texas

Harness v. Longview Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00102 Robert Alan Harness, Plaintiff, v. Longview Police Department et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Robert Alan Harness, proceeding pro se and 7m forma pauperis, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 20) conclud- ing that the complaint should be dismissed with prejudice until the Heck conditions are met. Heck ». Humphrey,

512 U.S. 477, 486-87

(1994); Johnson v. McElveen,

101 F.3d 423, 424

(5th Cir. 1996). No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass y. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996). Find- ing no clear error, abuse of discretion, or legal conclusions contrary to law, the court accepts the report and recommendation (Doc. 20). Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice until the Heck con- ditions are met. So ordered by the court on May 24, 2022. flecks BARKER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown