Reynolds v. Reynolds
Reynolds v. Reynolds
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00036 Jonathan Reynolds, Plaintiff, v. Ayesha Reynolds, Defendant.
ORDER Plaintiff Jonathan Reynolds, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for alleged civil-rights violations in prison pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred this case to United States Mag- istrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On March 31, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that the plaintiff be denied leave to proceed without pre- payment and that this case be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Doc. 6. No objections were filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. The plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment (Doc. 2) is denied, and this case is dismissed without prejudice.
So ordered by the court on May 24, 2022. fab BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown