UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS YUSUF O. BUSH, § § Plaintiff, § § versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-595 § T. J. WATSON, et al., § § Defendants. § § ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Yusuf O. Bush, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

(1971), against T. J. Watson, Unknown Hansen, Unknown Maze, Unknown Duck, Unknown Pitts, Unknown Hunter, Unknown Slaydon, and unidentified defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action pursuant to

(e) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed a reply to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, which the court liberally construes as objections. The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Plaintiff asks the court to hold this case in abeyance pending the United States Supreme Court’s resolution of Egbert v. Boule. In Boule, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether Bivens provides implied causes of action for First Amendment retaliation claims or for Fourth Amendment claims against federal officers engaged in immigration- related functions. Egbert v. Boule, U.S. _ ,

(Nov. 5, 2021) (No. 21-147). Because Plaintiffs complaint does not involve a retaliation claim or an immigration-related Fourth Amendment claim, the Supreme Court’s decision in Boule will not affect the result of this action. ORDER Accordingly, Plaintiff's objections #37) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#35) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 8th day of June, 2022.

PN be Orne. MARCIA A.CRONE- UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE