Garcia v. Lumpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00279 Ramon Alvardo Garcia, Plaintiff, v. Bobby Lumpkin et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Ramon Alvardo Garcia, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 2.

On August 8, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. Doc. 10. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, and he did not file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. 6) is denied.

So ordered by the court on November 9, 2022. fab BARKER United States District Judge