United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

EMEAL HICKS § TDCJ No. 1816690 § Vv. : CIVIL ACTION NO, 3:19-CV-733-S-BT DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID :

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 14. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Moreover, considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings in the United States District Court and

(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case in support of its finding that the petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000).

If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED. SIGNED January 5, 2022. fe UN □□ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE