Brown v. Underwood
Brown v. Underwood
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JAMES WILLIAM BROWN, ) # 13407-021, ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 3:19-CV-2140-M (BH) vs. ) ) WARDEN UNDERWOOD, FCI ) SEAGOVILLE, ) Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, received on September 10, 2019 (doc. 3), will be DENIED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal inmate to appeal the denial of relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States,
416 F. 424, 425 (Sth Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2022.
□□ 4, L-¥e AAG <j i A fi BARAM.G.LYNN OU HIEF JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown