Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
DARRON ANTOINE DEWAYNE ) TAYLOR, TDCJ No. 2085048, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. VS. ) ) 3:22-CV-2093-G-BN DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court therefore TRANSFERS Petitioner’s unauthorized successive
28 U.S.C. § 2254habeas application to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for appropriate action. And, because the court is transferring the application to the Fifth Circuit, a certificate of appealability (“COA”) is not necessary. See United States v. Fulton,
780 F.3d 683, 688(5th Cir.) (“[A] transfer order under [28 U.S.C.] § 1631 is not a final order within the meaning of [28 U.S.C.] § 2253(c)(1)(B), and the appeal of such an order does not require a COA.”), cert. denied,
577 U.S. 967(2015); Guel-Rivas v. Stephens,
599 F. App’x 175, 175(Sth Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (applying Fulton’s holding to transfer of a successive Section 2254 application). SO ORDERED. October 19, 2022. Cua. Faiak A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown