Tiner v. Young
Tiner v. Young
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION THOMAS TINER, Plaintiff, No. 5:22-CV-208-H-BQ CECILE YOUNG, etal. Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 4, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case. Dkt. No. 9. Judge Bryant recommended that the Court deny Tiner’s motion for a temporary restraining order. Id. at 5. No objections to the FCR were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation only for plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs, Auto. Ass'n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1417(Sth Cir. 1996), superseded by statute
on other grounds,
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,
975 F.3d 488, 502(5th Cir. 2020). The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the FCR of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Tiner’s motion (Dkt. No. 1) is dismissed. So ordered on October Z1_, 2022.
JAMESMWESLEY HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown