United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL L. FOGARTY, et al. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-2163-S-BK COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, etal. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. Subsequently, Plaintiff Michael L. Fogarty filed a notice of interlocutory appeal [ECF □□ No. 12] and a Motion for Appellate Judge Review [ECF No. 14]. Because a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is not an appealable order, any appeal of such report and recommendation before the district judge rules is frivolous. See Woodards v. Michaels Cos., No. 4:20-cv-00696-O-BP,

, at *2 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2020) (citing Hill v. Dall. Cnty. Dist. Att’y’s Off,

(Sth Cir. 2017)), adopted by

(N.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2020). Therefore, the Court retains jurisdiction over the case despite Plaintiff's interlocutory appeal. See

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with

(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are ACCEPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Finally, the Court TERMINATES Plaintiff's Motion for Appellate Judge Review [ECF No. 14]. The Court lacks the authority to grant the relief that Plaintiff requests. Plaintiff may re- urge the Motion in the appellate court. SO ORDERED. SIGNED December 20, 2023.

U STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

=)