Williams v. Gauna
Williams v. Gauna
Trial Court Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED January 18, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner. Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JEMADARI CHINUA WILLIAMS, § § Plaintiff, § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-0005 § JOEL GAUNA, et al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 49). The M&R recommends that the Court DENY Defendants Bryan Collier and Joel Gauna’s motion to dismiss, (D.E. 26), and Defendant Melanie Quiroga’s motion to dismiss, (D.E. 33). (D.E. 49, p. 1). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,
2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its
1/2
entirety. (D.E. 49). The Court DENIES Defendants Bryan Collier and Joel Gauna’s motion to dismiss, (D.E. 26), and Defendant Melanie Quiroga’s motion to dismiss, (D.E. 33). SO ORDERED. CG KA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas January J8 2023
2/2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown