Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 07, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, § Petitioner, V, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00126 WARDEN COX, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 15). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, (D.E. 14), and dismiss Petitioner’s claim for habeas corpus relief, (D.E. 1), (D.E. 15, p. 1, 4). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 15), Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent’s motion for summary judgment. (D.E. 14). Petitioner’s claim for habeas corpus relief pursuant to

is DISMISSED. (D.E. 1). A final judgment will be

1/2

entered separately. / ff 4 SO ORDERED. / ff / \ M__—— ( DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christy, Texas Februar , 2023

2/2