UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 24, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

GUILLERMO PENA, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00228 § WAYPOINT MARINE, INC., et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 25, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her “Amended Memorandum and Recommendation” (M&R, D.E. 15), recommending that the Court deny Defendant Uflex USA, Inc.’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 15), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendant Uflex USA, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 3) is DENIED. ORDERED on February 24, 2023. [eke GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2