Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Maren OF 2028 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan □□□□□□□ clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JEWELL THOMAS, § Plaintiff, V. □ § CIVIL ACTION NO, 2:22-cv-00133 CHRISTOPHER CARTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchell Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 23). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Jewell Thomas’s motion to alter or amend judgment, in which Plaintiff seeks leave to amend his complaint. (D.E. 23, p. 1); see (D.E. 22). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its

1/2

entirety. (D.E. 23). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend . fi d t. (D.E. 22). - 4 / inten (8.2 > fff SO ORDERED. [ / [/ [ é f eee \ L- AS DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 7, 2023

2/2