Garcia v. Rodriguez

District Court, S.D. Texas

Garcia v. Rodriguez

Trial Court Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ' ENTERED March 14, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION GREGORIO GARCIA, III, § “Plaintiff”, § § Vv. § Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00102 § BERNADETTE RODRIGUEZ, et al., § “Defendants”. . § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION _—_[——_——_—S SEE AL EI ES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Plaintiff Gregorio Garcia, III’s “Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights” (Dkt. No. 1) and the “Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 52). The R&R recommends this Court (1) dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's claims for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and (2) direct the Clerk of Court to close this case. No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to close this case.

Signed on this | day of (~~ \ ace hk , 2023,

Rolgefdo Olvera Umted States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown