Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 27, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION PATRICK DENNIS HOSTETTER, § Plaintiff, VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00182 ARANSAS COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 31). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Patrick Dennis Hostetter’s motion to alter or amend the Court’s final judgment. Id. at 1. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R

1/2

in its entirety. (D.E. 31). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the Court’s final judgment is DENIED. (D.E. 30). SO ORDERED. [ \ / [/ é Jf \ \ SKA S \ \ Sf / 4 DAVIDS. M ORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 72 =¥*5 2023

2/2