Foreshee v. Lumpkin
Foreshee v. Lumpkin
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 28, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk VICTORIA DIVISION CHAD ALLEN FORESHEE, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 6:22-CV-00014 § BOBBY LUMPKIN, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is the September 9, 2022 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton. (Dkt. No. 15). In the M&R, Magistrate Judge Hampton recommends that the Court (1) grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. No. 12), and instructs the Clerk of the Court to send notice of Plaintiff’s dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at [email protected]. (Dkt. No. 15). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections were filed. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the M&R, (Dkt. No. 15), as the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS the Defendant’s Motion. Plaintiff’s claims for money damages against Defendant in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's individual-capacity RLUIPA claim against Defendant in his official capacity and Plaintiff’s RLUIPA claim seeking monetary damages are DISMISSED WITH PEJUDICE. Plaintiff's individual- and official-capacity First Amendment claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court of the Clerk is INSTRUCTED to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern’ District of Texas at [email protected]. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on February 27, 2023. R J
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown