UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 29, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

MARCUS E ADAMS, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00218 § THE CITY OF TAFT, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE

On February 28, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (M&R, D.E. 32), recommending that the Court grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 25). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 32), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 25) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED on March 29, 2023. [eke GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2