Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 02, 2088 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan □□□□□□□□ Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION HARVEY TORRES, § Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO, 2:22-CV-00027 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL § SECURITY, § Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION □ Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), (D.E. 19). The M&R recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and dismiss Plaintiffs case. (D.E. 1). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 19). Accordingly, the Court affirms the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and dismisses this case. (D.E. 1). All claims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately.

1/2

SO ORDERED. \ / / DAVID’S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas May 2, 2023

2/2