UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 31, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

ADAM ALEXANDER PERRY, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00281 § AUSTIN J HART, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT On April 26, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment” (M&R, D.E. 55). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 55), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the 1 / 2 Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (D.E. 52) is DENIED. ORDERED on May 31, 2023. [eke GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2