Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 18, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION TRACY GRAY, § '

Petitioner, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00011 COX, et al, § Respondents. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 5). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s cause of action because the relief he seeks can only be granted through-a

petition filed in the Western District of Texas. See

. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badatki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D, Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 1/2

5). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner’s cause of action. A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED.

.M LES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas July 17, 2023

2/2