Martinez v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. Texas

Martinez v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 13, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION

MARGARITA MARTINEZ and § GABRIEL R. MARTINEZ, § § Plaintiffs, § § VS. § Civil Case No. 7:23-CV-00205 § HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT § INSURANCE COMPANY, MINNESOTA § LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, § TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE § COMPANY, IBC BANK and JOHN DOE, § § Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the October 12, 2023, Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 17). Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. 3) be denied and that Defendant IBC Bank be dismissed from the lawsuit. (Dkt. No. 17). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

434 F.3d 303, 308

(5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Bray’s M&R (Dkt. No. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. 3) is DENIED; and (3) | Defendant IBC Bank is DISMISSED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on November 13, 2023.

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown