UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 21, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

RONALD THOMAS, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00142 § TEXAS DEPT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, § et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On November 15, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration” (D.E. 44). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 44), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Rule 54(b) motion to reconsider the Court’s October 31 Order adopting the memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 43) is DENIED. ORDERED on December 21, 2023. eke GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2