Simmons v. Salazar

District Court, W.D. Texas

Simmons v. Salazar

Trial Court Opinion

FILED May 12, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICL □□ TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION py PT DEPUTY RYAN SIMMONS, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL NO. SA:23-CV-00334-OLG § SHERIFF JAVIER SALAZAR, ET AL., § § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), which recommends that Plaintiff Ryan Simmons’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) be granted but that Plaintiff’s proposed Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 ULS.C. § 1915(e). (See Dkt. No. 3.) Plaintiff was served with a copy of the R&R, see Dkt. No. 6, and the time to object has passed. The Court has thus reviewed the R&R to determine whether it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989). It is not. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the R&R should be accepted. It is therefore ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Chestney’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 3) is ACCEPTED. It is further ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R&R, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED but Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1-1) is DISMISSED. This case is CLOSED. It isso ORDERED.

SIGNED this 12th day of May, 2023. VW \ \ ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown