FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 06, 2023 WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BY: NM ARTURO GAITAN ) DEPUTY ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. SA-22-CV-882-OLG ) ) LINDA MOLINA, et. al. ) ) Defendants )

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION On this date the Court considered the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer, filed in the above-styled and numbered cause on August 15, 2023. Docket no. 17. The parties were served with a copy of the recommendation, and no objections have been filed.’ Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. Instead, the Court need only review the recommendation and determine whether it is either clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

(1989). The Court has reviewed the recommendation and the findings and conclusions therein are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. It is therefore ORDERED that the recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer, filed

'A party desiring to object to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations must file and serve written objections within 14 days after being served with the recommendations.

(b)(1); FED. R. Clv. P. 72(b)(2). Service is made to the last known address of the party or his attorney, and service by mail is complete upon mailing. FED. R. Civ. P. 5(b).

in this cause on August 15, 2023, is hereby ACCEPTED pursuant to

(b)(1). It is further ORDERED that all claims asserted in Plaintiff's complaint are DISMISSED pursuant to

(e) for the reasons stated in the recommendation.” This case may be CLOSED. SIGNED on the (p day of September, 20238.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

?The arguments raised in Defendants’ motion to dismiss (docket no. 10) are moot, as it is not necessary to reach them.

0)