Kittrell v. King

District Court, E.D. Texas

Kittrell v. King

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00104 Jason Irvin Kittrell, Plaintiff, v. Sherry L. King et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Jason Kittrell, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Plaintiff paid the full filing fee and is not proceeding zu forma pauperis. He must thus effect service of process on the defend- ants. On June 23, 2022, the magistrate judge ordered that process be issued and delivered to plaintiff for service. On October 14, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a show-cause order advising plaintiff that dismissal would be recommended unless plaintiff ef- fected service within 30 days or showed cause why the case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff received a copy of this order on Octo- ber 20, 2022, but did not respond. On December 7, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service of process and failure to comply with a court order. A copy of that report was mailed to plaintiff at his last known address, and no objections were filed. The Fifth Circuit has explained that when a letter is properly placed in the United States mail, a presumption exists that the letter reached its desti- nation in the usual time and was actually received by the person to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada,

931 F.3d 412

, 420-21 and n.9 (5th Cir. 2019).

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s re- port and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service of process and failure to obey an order of the court. So ordered by the court on January 25, 2023. faba BARKER United States District Judge

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown