UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00473 Fred A. Dixon, Jr., Plaintiff, V. Sheriff, Defendant.

ORDER Plaintiff Fred A. Dixon, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil- rights lawsuit pursuant to

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 3) concluding that plaintiffs complaint should be dismissed with prejudice for purposes of zn forma pauperis proceedings pursuant to

(g). Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommenda- tion, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996). Having re- viewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it con- tains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommenda- tion.. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of 7m forma pauperis proceed- ings pursuant to

(g). Plaintiff may resume his law- suit if he pays the entire filing fee of $402.00 within 30 days after the entry of the final judgment. So ordered by the court on January 25, 2023. facbod BARKER United States District Judge