UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00053 Fred A. Dixon, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Unknown, Defendant.

ORDER Plaintiff Fred A. Dixon, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed the above- styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 3) concluding that plaintiff’s complaint should be dis- missed with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceed- ings pursuant to

(g). No objections were filed. When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s re- port and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of 7” forma pauperis pro- ceedings pursuant to

(g). Plaintiff may resume his lawsuit if he pays the entire filing fee of $402 within 30 days after the entry of the final judgment. So ordered by the court on March 21, 2023. flab BARKER United States District Judge