Emmett v. TDCJ Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00243 Barry Emmett, Plaintiff, V. TDCJ Corporation et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Barry Emmett, proceeding pro se, filed the above- styled and numbered civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report (Doc. 119) recommending that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 94) should be denied for failing to meet the necessary prerequisites for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pro- cedure 65. Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommenda- tion.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s re- port and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Doc. 119. For the rea- sons stated in the report, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary in- junction is denied. Doc. 94.

So ordered by the court on April 5, 2023.

ji CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge