Dixon v. Biden
Dixon v. Biden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00150 Fred A. Dixon, Jr., Plaintiff, V. Joe Biden et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Fred A. Dixon, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil- rights lawsuit pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 3. On April 5, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice for fail- ure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Doc. 3. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, who received it on April 21, 2023, and did not file written objections. Doc. 4. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceed- ings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff may resume his law- suit if he pays the entire filing fee of $402 within thirty days after the entry of the final judgment. So ordered by the court on June 28, 2023.
j? ‘CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown