Adams v. Central Grievance Office
Adams v. Central Grievance Office
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00177 Alex Adams, Plaintiff, v. Central Grievance Office et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Alex Adams, a prisoner of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, filed this civil-rights lawsuit pur- suant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983without paying the filing fee. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pur- suant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On April 19, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that the court bar plaintiff from proceeding i forma pau- peris pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismiss this case unless plaintiff paid the filing fee within 15 days. Doc. 4. A copy of the re- port was mailed to plaintiff, who has neither filed written objections nor paid the filing fee. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. Plaintiff is denied leave to proceed as a pauper, and this case is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding 7 forma pau- peris under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) but without prejudice as to the refil- ing of the lawsuit with payment of the full filing fee.
So ordered by the court on June 29, 2023. faba BARKER United States District Judge
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown