Dixon v. King
Dixon v. King
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00072 Fred A. Dixon, Jr., Plaintiff, V. E. J. King et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Fred A. Dixon, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil- rights lawsuit pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report and recommendation concluding that plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed with prejudice for purposes of 7 forma pauperis proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Doc. 3. Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assn,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s complaint is dis- missed with prejudice for purposes of 7” forma pauperis proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff may resume his lawsuit if he pays the entire filing fee of $402 within 30 days of the entry of final judgment. So ordered by the court on June 30, 2023.
j/ CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown