Angel-Crowell v. TDCJ Mark W. Michael's Unit
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00048 Brandon James Angel-Crowell, Plaintiff, V. TDCJ Mark W. Michael’s Unit, Defendant.
ORDER Plaintiff Brandon James Angel-Crowell, an inmate proceeding pro se and 7m forma pauperis, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which was transferred to this court for proper venue and referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
On June 30, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that this case be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prose- cute and failure to comply with the court’s orders. Doc. 41. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, who did not file written objec- tions.
When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice.
Because plaintiff’s complaint includes events dating from 2021, the statute of limitations in this case is suspended for 90 days from the entry of judgment. See Campbell v. Wilkinson, 988 F.3d 798, 801 n.1 (5th Cir. 2021) (explaining that “[w]here further litigation of [a] claim will be time-barred, a dismissal without prejudice is no less se- vere a sanction than a dismissal with prejudice, and the same stand- ard of review is used”’).
So ordered by the court on August 8, 2023.
j/ CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge _2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.