UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00008 Raul Vega, Plaintiff, v. David Guiterriez et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Raul G. Vega, an inmate at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Stiles Unit, proceeding pro se and im forma pau- perts, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged violations of his rights pursuant to

. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On May 30, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 13. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the report and recom- mendation on June 6, 2023. Doc. 16. Plaintiff has not filed an ob- jection to the report and recommendation, and the timeframe for doing so has passed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its find- ings and recommendation. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The dismis- sal of this action under § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous counts as a strike under

(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons,

(5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff is warned that if he accumulates three strikes he will not be permitted to proceed zn forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of se- rious physical injury. See § 1915(g). All motions pending in this civil action are denied. So ordered by the court on August 16, 2023. fabs BARKER United States District Judge

_2-