Emmett v. TDCJ Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00243 Barry Emmett, Plaintiff, V. TDCJ Corporation et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Barry Emmett, proceeding pro se, filed the above styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend (Doc. 134) in which he asserts that “all claims are dropped except aluminum salt.”

Doc. 134 at 1. He further states: “I’m requesting leave to amend [my] claim[s] to drop all other claims.”

The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (Doc.

149) construing plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 134) asa voluntary dismissal of all claims and defendants, except for plain- tiff’s claim regarding aluminum salt, which was asserted against Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Executive Director Bryan Collier. No party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment.

The report recommends that TDCJ, the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), UTMB-CMC Director Owen Murray, UTMB ADA Disability Director Cotton Armstrong, the Coffield Unit grievance investigators, the State of Texas, plaintiff’s Ameri- cans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim, his medical deliberate indif- ference claims, and his conditions of confinement claims (with the exception of his aluminum salt claim) be voluntarily dismissed pur- suant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass □□ United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Find- ing no clear error, abuse of discretion, or legal conclusions contrary to law, the court accepts the report and recommendation (Doc. 149).

Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 134) is granted. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s claims against TDCJ, UTMB, Murray, Armstrong, the Coffield Unit grievance investigators, and the State of Texas are voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Likewise, plaintiff’s ADA, medical deliber- ate indifference, and conditions of confinement claims, with the ex- ception of the aluminum salt claim, are voluntarily dismissed, with- out prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The clerk of court is directed to terminate TDCJ, UTMB, Owen Murry, Cotton Arm- strong, the Coffield Unit grievance investigators, and the State of Texas as defendants in this case.

So ordered by the court on September 5, 2023. _f MPBELL BARKER United States District Judge -2-