IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

§ JAY WILLIAMS, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 6:23-cv-224-JDK-KNM § MARY WRIGHT, § § Defendant. § §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Jay Williams, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights lawsuit under

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to

. On June 13, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and, alternatively, for failure to prosecute or to obey a Court order. Docket No. 5. Plaintiff filed a letter that the Court will construe as an objection to the Report. Docket No. 7. Where a party timely objects to the Report and Recommendation, the Court reviews the objected-to findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo.

(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute,

(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). The Report recommended dismissal for failure to prosecute or to obey a Court order because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint and failed to pay the statutory filing fee, as ordered by the Magistrate Judge. See Docket Nos. 2, 3. The Report recommended dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because Plaintiff's complaint names Mary Wright as the sole defendant in this case, but contains no allegations concerning Mary Wright. See Docket No. 1. Plaintiff's letter—construed as objections—does not address these issues. The Court therefore OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. Having conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct, and Plaintiffs objections are without merit. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 5) as the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Further, the Court notifies Plaintiff that the continued filing of frivolous or vexatious pleadings, documents, or letters could result in the imposition of sanctions, monetary or otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2023. qu J Korb JHKREMYD. KERN DLE ITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE