Wilcox v. McEvoy
Wilcox v. McEvoy
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00388
Corey Lynn Wilcox, Plaintiff, V. David McEvoy, Defendant.
ORDER Plaintiff Corey Lynn Wilcox, proceeding pro se and 7m forma pau- peris, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursu- ant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Mag- istrate Judge John D. Love. Thereafter, defendant David McEvoy filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18). On August 1, 2023, Judge Love issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 28), recom- mending that the motion be granted, and that plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice on grounds of qualified immunity. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the report and recommendation. Doc. 30. To date, no objections have been filed and the time period for doing so has passed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satis- fied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation (Doc. 28). For the reasons stated in the report, de- fendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18) is granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice on grounds of qualified immunity.
So ordered by the court on September 14, 2023. faci BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown